About International Journal of Organizational Leadership

Peer Review Policy on International Journal of Organizational Leadership

 

 

The practice of peer review is to ensure that the highest quality research paper is published in International Journal of Organizational Leadership. The reviewers of International Journal of Organizational Leadership play a key role in establishing and enforcing the high standards of International Journal of Organizational Leadership. All manuscripts submitted are double-blind peer reviewed.

 

Initial Manuscript Evaluation

The editor-in-chief first evaluates all submissions. Submissions rejected at this stage are not original research, have serious scientific flaws in terms of research question(s) and hypotheses, data collection, data analysis, and discussion, have poor language in terms of structure, jargon, and genre, or are not in the scope of International Journal of Organizational Leadership. Corresponding Authors of manuscripts rejected at initial manuscript evaluation stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.

The manuscripts which meet the minimum criteria are sent for double-blind review by at least 2 experts in the field of organization and leadership.

 

Double-Blind Review

The reviewers are requested to evaluate whether the manuscript is an original research, is methodologically sound and robust, covers the most relevant literature review, has results which are clearly and concisely presented, has an elaborated discussion based on the research questions and hypotheses, and provides practical implications and suggestions for future research. This stage of review takes 4-5 weeks.

           

This evaluation is done on the basis of the following criteria:

 

  1. Overall quality, scientific originality, and Significance for theory and practice
  2. The literature review
  3. Theoretical Framework and Conceptual Rationale
  4. Clear definition of the research questions and hypotheses
  5. Research design and data collection procedure
  6. Research Methodology
  7. Data analysis
  8. Clarity of the results and appropriateness of the interpretations
  9. Style (APA 6th Edition) and language



Editor’s Decision is Final

Referees advise the editor-in-chief, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript.